Syrian Refugees and President Obama's Constitutional Misrepresentation

From The Wall Builders comes a fantastic editorial on President Obama's attempted rewrite of Article VI of the US Constitution so as to support his political agenda regarding Syrian refugees fleeing their war-torn country.
This is yet another example of the President of the United States attempting to alter the Constitution--the very guiding principles of our country--to push his political agenda forward, which is clearly becoming his attempt to change the very fabric of law that this country was founded upon. Please read on.

Article VI of the Constitution

Following the recent attacks in Paris, and after learning that terrorists were hiding among Muslim Syrian refugees, a political battle erupted in America over allowing those refugees to enter. The President supported their continued admission while Congress voted to increase screening of those refugees. Numerous governors added their opposition to accepting Syrian refugees.
Presidential candidates Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz recommended that America accept only Christian refugees from Syria, but President Obama flatly dismissed that proposal, explaining:

When I hear folks say that, well, "Maybe we should just admit the Christians but not the Muslims" -- when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted. . . that’s shameful.

The President's allusion to a “religious test” is a reference to Article VI of the Constitution, which says:

. . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

President Obama, once again, has completely rewritten the simple wording of the Constitution to make it say something it does not. As is evident from the clear wording above, the "religious test" clause applies only to federally elected and appointed officials, and that's all. It does not apply to immigrants or anyone who does not hold federal office.
Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story (considered one of the two "Fathers of American Jurisprudence") affirmed this in his famous 1833 Commentary on the Constitution:

 This clause. . . is designed to cut off every pretense of an alliance between the Church and State in the administration of the National Government. (emphasis added)

This clause specifically ensured that there would be no requirement that all federal officials must belong to just one specific denomination, which had been the case across much of Europe at the time the Constitution was written.
Signer of the Constitution Richard Dobbs Spaight likewise affirmed:

As to the subject of religion. . . . [n]o power is given to the general [federal] government to interfere with it at all. . . . No sect [denomination] is preferred to another. Every man has a right to worship the Supreme Being in the manner he thinks proper. No test is required. All men of equal capacity and integrity are equally eligible to offices.

The religious test clause of the U.S. Constitution applies only to those holding a federal office.
Whether or not Syrian Muslim refugees should be accepted into America is still to be determined, but contrary to what President Obama claims, Article VI of the Constitution has absolutely nothing to do with the debate. 

Veterans Day Salute 2015

My wife is a Veteran of the US Army, serving from 1979-1983 in Europe at the height of the Cold War. As a Military Intelligence officer, she was often on the front lines in Eastern Europe, and served her country with pride and distinction.
The following text is from the National Day of Prayer task Force, in honor of all those who have served in the military to protect and defend the United States.

Honoring America's Heroes

by John Bornschein

As we honor those who have served in the United States Armed Forces, the National Day of Prayer Task Force encourages you to pray for our military families and diligently intercede on behalf of those who continue to fight for freedom across the globe. Scriptures remind us that Almighty God goes before us even on the battlefield:

He appointed military officers over the people and assembled them before him in the square at the city gate and encouraged them with these words: “Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or discouraged because of the king of Assyria and the vast army with him, for there is a greater power with us than with him. With him is only the arm of flesh, but with us is the LORD our God to help us and to fight our battles.” – II Chronicles 32:6-8

The National Day of Prayer Task Force would like to salute our brave men and women who have courageously stood on the front lines throughout America’s history to defend the defenseless, to protect the innocent, and even lay down their lives. We pause and remember the many who made the ultimate sacrifice, as well as those who were prepared to do so though it was not required. Most of all, we remember the character and devotion with which each of them served this nation as champions of liberty.

Today, we echo the sentiment of President Ronald Reagan’s 1988 Veterans Day address:

“… in our hearts you will always be young, full of the love that is youth, love of life, love of joy, love of country – you fought for your country and for its safety and for the freedom of others with strength and courage. We love you for it. We honor you. And we have faith that, as He does all His sacred children, the Lord will bless you and keep you, the Lord will make His face to shine upon you and give you peace, now and forevermore.”

Join with us as we unite in prayer for our military families, our chaplains, those who have served, and those who continue to serve this great nation. These are America’s heroes. May we never forget their perseverance and vigilance. May we never forget their sacrifice.

 

May God bless you and may God bless America!

John Bornschein
Vice Chairman
National Day of Prayer Task Force

Ben Stein on Christmas and God

From the always enlightened and spot on correct Ben Stein:

"Apparently the White House referred to Christmas Trees as Holiday Trees for the first time this year, which prompted Ben Stein, to say, on CBS Sunday Morning,
...My confession: I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejewelled trees, Christmas trees. I don't feel threatened. I don't feel discriminated against. That's what they are, Christmas trees.

It doesn't bother me a bit when people say, 'Merry Christmas' to me. I don't think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year. It doesn't bother me at all that there is a manger scene on display at a key intersection near my beach house in Malibu. If people want a nativity scene, it's just as fine with me as is the Menorah a few hundred yards away.

I don't like getting pushed around for being a Jew, and I don't think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians. I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period. I have no idea where the concept came from, that America is an explicitly atheist country. I can't find it in the Constitution and I don't like it being shoved down my throat.
Or maybe I can put it another way: where did the idea come from that we should worship celebrities and we aren't allowed to worship God? I guess that's a sign that I'm getting old, too. But there are a lot of us who are wondering where these celebrities came from and where the America we knew went to.

In light of the many jokes we send to one another for a laugh, this is a little different: This is not intended to be a joke; it's not funny, it's intended to get you thinking.

Billy Graham's daughter was interviewed on the Early Show and Jane Clayson asked her 'How could God let something like this happen?' (regarding Hurricane Katrina). Anne Graham gave an extremely profound and insightful response. She said, 'I believe God is deeply saddened by this, just as we are, but for years we've been telling God to get out of our schools, to get out of our government and to get out of our lives.And being the gentleman He is, I believe He has calmly backed out. How can we expect God to give us His blessing and His protection if we demand He leave us alone?'

In light of recent events... terrorist attacks, school shootings, etc. I think it started when Madeleine Murray O'Hare (she was murdered, her body found a few years ago) complained she didn't want prayer in our schools, and we said OK. Then someone said you better not read the Bible in school. The Bible says thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not steal, and love your neighbor as yourself. And we said OK.

Then Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn't spank our children when they misbehave, because their little personalities would be warped and we might damage their self-esteem (Dr. Spock's son committed suicide). We said an expert should know what he's talking about. And we said okay.
Now we're asking ourselves why our children have no conscience, why they don't know right from wrong, and why it doesn't bother them to kill strangers, their classmates, and themselves.
Probably, if we think about it long and hard enough, we can figure it out. I think it has a great deal to do with 'WE REAP WHAT WE SOW.'

Funny how simple it is for people to trash God and then wonder why the world's going to hell.
Funny how we believe what the newspapers say, but question what the Bible says.
Funny how you can send 'jokes' through e-mail and they spread like wildfire, but when you start sending messages regarding the Lord, people think twice about sharing.
Funny how lewd, crude, vulgar and obscene articles pass freely through cyberspace, but public discussion of God is suppressed in the school and workplace.
Are you laughing yet?

Funny how when you forward this message, you will not send it to many on your address list because you're not sure what they believe, or what they will think of you for sending it.
Funny how we can be more worried about what other people think of us than what God thinks of us.
Pass it on if you think it has merit.

If not, then just discard it.... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what a bad shape the world is in.

My Best Regards, Honestly and respectfully,

-Ben Stein"

A Senator's view of the US Constitution

The following Constitution Day commemoration from Senator Orrin Hatch is simply outstanding! Please read the brief text in its entirety.

"Yesterday marked the 228th anniversary of the signing of the Constitution.  228 years ago, 39 brave and wise men set their names to the document that has guided our government and our politics ever since. 

With each passing year I am increasingly impressed by the genius of those who framed our Constitution.  The world was a very different place back in 1787.  There was no electricity, no railroads, no air conditioning.  Crossing the Atlantic Ocean took months.  News traveled slowly, on horseback.  Our nation, which today covers a continent, comprised only thirteen states with a combined population of 4 million people.   That’s roughly the current population of Oklahoma.  

Despite these vastly different circumstances, the Framers created a system that has endured for over two hundred years and become an example to the world of stability and strength.  They did so by enshrining in the Constitution certain fundamental principles about government and the source of rights, coupled with an objective, honest view of the failings of human nature. 

The Framers recognized that our rights come from God, not government, and that it is the role of government to  secure, not create, rights.  They recognized that government unrestrained is a threat to liberty, and that in order to protect citizens from government’s constant tendency to expand its sphere, ambition must be made to counteract ambition.

Thus the Framers created the separation of powers; federalism; checks and balances; an independent judiciary; a bicameral legislature; and an executive that, while unified, lacked the power of the purse.  Each branch of government would have to share power with the others, just as states and the federal government would have to share power as well. 

By preventing any one branch, or any one level of government, from being able to act unilaterally in its affairs, the Constitution ensured that no one individual or group would be able to run roughshod over any other.  And just as important, the Constitution ensured that no major policy change could occur without substantial support from large numbers of Americans at all levels of government and society.

Unfortunately, there are some today who view the Constitution as an obstacle to overcome, a barrier to supposed progress.  These individuals find fault with the fact that the Constitution makes change difficult and requires broad, long-lasting consensus in order to enact major reform.  Surely the exigencies of the day, they argue, warrant bypassing or even ignoring the separation of powers, federalism, and other critical elements of our constitutional structure.   Although some of these individuals may be well intentioned, they are fundamentally misguided.

The fact is that the Constitution is not an obstacle — it is a guide.  A guide for how we should approach our contemporary problems, for how we should think about our roles as citizens and legislators, for how we should conduct ourselves as we debate the problems of the day.

More than a guide, the Constitution is a miracle.  It is a miracle because it has endured for over two hundred years.  It is a miracle because of what it teaches about prudent government and the need to guard against human failings.  It is a miracle because the lessons it provides are just as relevant today as they were 228 years ago.  May we ever look to the Constitution for guidance and pay it increased fidelity as we discharge our duties here in Washington and across this great land.

A Pennsylvania Proclamation

On this Constitution Day--a commemoration of the US Constitution, I decided to illustrate  one States' proclamation for the observance of a day of worship to be on Sundays. This was done on November 20th, 1782. While not endorsing a single religion, it observes the need for citizens to worship God for the prosperity of our Country.

*This is REAL history, folks, not the sterilized version that so many secularists would have you believe. Please read this eye-opening, inspiring proclamation. (I have added a photocopy of the document below.)

"By the President and Supreme  Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,A Proclamation.  

As the best and greatest of Beings commanded mankind into existence with a capacity for happiness, bestowing upon them understanding and many "good gifts"; so when they, by an abuse of the blessings thus intrusted, had involved themselves in guilt and misery, his compassion was extended towards them, and in "his tender mercies," not  only "seed time and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night," were continued unto them, but "the eternal purposes” were revealed, and the heavenly treasuries opened, to restore the human race to the transcendent privilege from which by transgression they were fallen: AND in this "marvelous work," the laws of righteousness have been with such infinite wisdom adjusted, and united to the obligation of nature, that while they jointly tended to promote the felicity of men in a future state, they evidently cooperate to advance their welfare in the present, and to offend against the sanctions of revelation, of the dictates of reason and conscience, is suredly to betray the joys of this life, as well as those of another.

 Wherefore, as we are entirely persuaded that just impressions of the deity are the great supports of morality, AND As the experience of ages demonstrates, that regularity of manners is essential to the tranquility and prosperity of societies, AND the assistance of the Almighty, on which we rely, to establish the inestimable blessings our afflicted country is contending for, cannot be expected without an observance of his holy laws, We esteem it our principal and indispensable duty to endeavor, as much as we can, that a sense of these interesting truths may prevail in the hearts and appear in the lives of the inhabitants of this state; And Therefore have thought proper to issue this Proclamation, sincerely desiring that they seriously meditating on the many signal and unmerited  benefits of public and private import conferred upon them,  the affecting invitations  and munificent promises of divine goodness, and the "terrors set in array" against disobedient, may be urged to exert themselves in avoiding, discountenancing, and suppressing all vice, profaneness and immorality, and feeling a due gratitude, love, and veneration for their most gracious, all-wise, and omnipotent Benefactor, Sovereign, and Judge, and correspondent temper of resignation to the dispensations of his Supreme Government, may become a people "trusting in him, in whom they live and move and doing good."
And to the intent that these desirable ends may be forwarded, all persons are herby fervently exhorted, to observe the Lord's Day, commonly called Sunday, and thereon constantly to attend the worship of GOD, as a service pleasing to him who is, "a hearer of prayer," and condescends to "inhabit the praises of his people," and profitable to themselves; a neglect of which duty has, in multitude of instances, been the beginning of a deviation into the ways of presumption, that at length have led into the deepest distresses and severest sorrows:
 

And As the education of youth is of so much moment to themselves and to the commonwealth, which cannot flourish unless that important point be diligently regarded, the sentiments, dispositions, and habits begin then generally formed that pervade the rest of their lives, all parents, guardians, masters, and tutors are herby strenuously called upon, to discharge the high trust committed to them, and for which they must account, by a faithful attention; that those under their care may be nurtured in piety, filial reverence, submission to superiors in age or station, modesty, sincerity, benevolence, temperance,  industry, consistency of behavior, and frugality regulated by an humble reliance on Providence, and a kind respect for others; that their inexperienced minds may be by wholesome instructions fully convinced, that whatever employment they are designed for, virtue will be a chief promoter of success, and irregularity of conduct the greatest obstacle to it; that the intellectual faculties are aided by moral improvements, but weakened by illicit courses; and in brief, that Religion is the fiend of their peace, health and happiness; and that to displease their Maker, or trespass against their neighbor, is inevitably to inure themselves.
 

AND we expect and hereby require, that all well disposed persons, and especially those in places of authority, will by their conversation and demeanor encourage and promote piety and virtue, and to their utmost contribute to the rendering these qualities truly laudable and honorable, and the contrary practices justly shameful and contemptible; that thus the  influence of good men, and the dignity of the laws, may be combined in repressing the follies and insolencies of scorners and profligates, in directing the weak and thoughtless, and in preserving them from the pernicious contagion of evil examples; AND for further promoting such reformation, it is hereby enjoined, that all magistrates, and others whom it may concern, be very vigilant and exact in discovering, prosecuting, and punishing all persons who shall be guilty of profanation of the Lord's Day, commonly called Sunday, blasphemy, profane swearing or cursing, drunkenness, lewdness, or other dissolute or immoral practices; that they suppress all gaming houses, and other disorderly houses, that they put in execution the act of General Assembly, entitled, "An Act for the suppression of Vice and Immorality," and all other laws now in force for the punishing and suppressing any vice, profaneness or immorality: AND for the more effectual proceeding herein, all Judges and Justice, having cognizance in the premises, are directed to give strict charges at their respective Courts and Sessions, for the due prosecution and punishment of all who shall presume to offend in any of the kinds aforesaid; and also of all  such as, contrary to their duty, shall be remiss or negligent in putting the laws in execution: And that they do at their respective  Courts and Sessions cause this Proclamation to be publicly read, immediately before the charge is given: AND every Minister of the Gospel is requested strongly to inculcate in the respective congregations where they officiate, a love of piety and virtue, and an abhorrence of vice, profaneness, and immorality.

Given in council, under the hand of the President, and the Seal of the State, at Philadelphia, this twentieth day of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty two.

John Dickinson.
Attest.
T. Matlack,,  Secretary.

 God Save the Commonwealth."

The Insanity of Gender Pronouns

An article from the Associate Press (by Collin Binkley) today highlights the growing trend on University campuses nationwide to eliminate Gender Specific designations to accommodate those whose personal choices lead them to identify themselves as anything other than male or female saying they are "sexually fluid" (whatever the HELL that is supposed to mean), or whatever other excuse they can derive to disassociate themselves as being male or female.

The reasoning behind these changes is so as to accommodate everyone's feelings so they don't feel excluded from society because of--again-- their personal choices. Instead of adapting to everyone, they must express themselves and demand that we conform to them. Anyhow, as you can see in my opening, my opinion is otherwise, and I responded with the following:

"Male. Female. That's it. That's all there is. No matter the "gender pronoun" (however the HELL that is supposed to offend anyone), it comes down to just two. Male and Female.

Just because someone feel ostricized from society by their choices certainly doesn't mean they can invent new gender pronouns from which to announce their personal issues to the world.

Talk about the vast minority dictating to the vast majority how they intend to rule others. Geez, I'm on dialysis; have been for three years. In 2013 I had both kidneys removed. Should I demand to receive a special designation because I am living with no kidneys just so others don't offend me when talking about their bladders and having to pee?! Seriously.

That's the kind of crap these LGBT types want to push on all of us heterosexual Americans, and I for one am totally fed up with this garbage. Go live in Canada or Mexico and stop trying to force this country to change to accomodate you. As a group, you remind me of the illegals immigrants in this country--You want everyone to conform to you, but don't want to adapt to this country. Great way to gain respect and acceptance in society.

Here's a thought...

Acceptance is a two way street. How come the very group (LGBT) that espouses tolerance so clearly displays NONE towards anyone who disagrees with their opinions? Some of the worst, most hateful commentaries out there are from those who push the LGBT agenda. If you think I'm wrong, just take a good look at the comments from articles surrounding say, the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage. Those responses will appall the faint hearted, and offend pretty much most people. The intolerance being displayed is absolutely nauseating! And that is from the winning side!

To have to qualify yourself as anything other than Male or Female is a move towards insanity, and is just another big step in the downfall of what was once the beacon on the hill of humanity."

Serena Williams: The Biggest Sore Loser of All

An article on USA Today by Chris Chase highlights the complete lack of sportsmanship on the part of Tennis champion, Serena Williams. I have comments on this issue numerous times in the past, but this response was especially needing inclusion in this blog. Here's my reply:

"Serena Williams has perhaps the worst sportsmanship in US pro-level competition. She rarely--if ever--acknowledges her competitors whether she wins or loses. But most egregiously, when she loses, she NEVER compliments the winner. All she does is make excuses as to why she lost; as if the mere thought of someone beating her is repugnant to this biggest of all sore losers. Her incessant staged PR shoots codify the fact that she is as ugly on the inside as her lack of sportsmanship is on the outside; as if she's trying to believe her own PR stunts.
Tennis is, historically, a sport of graciousness and dignity. Serena Williams displays her complete contempt for those qualities by continually displaying tactlessness to both competitors and officiating, and her ugliness shines through every time her little tantrums flare up.
I watched Williams' match with Bethany Mattack-Sands, and something occurred during the match that simply floored me--announcer Chris Everet actually made excuses for Serena's poor first Set play; sounding exactly like Serena's press conferences whenever she loses. That was simply pathetic, and clearly demonstrates the fact that Everet has bought into the Serena Williams legend, rather than remaining the objective observer that any announcer should be.
Personally, I think Serena has been influenced too much by her racist father; you know, the same guy whom the USTA banned from all their events because of his race baiting, hateful rhetoric. THAT is where Serena's bad sportsmanship comes from; but I seriously doubt that anyone will say anything to her simply because she's Serena Williams, the greatest tennis player in history (man or woman, in her own mind), and for whom graciousness is as foreign a word as acknowledging her opponent's outstanding efforts is to Ms Williams.
Too bad so many mindless fans buy into her greatness and make excuses for her as much as she does for her losses. Serena could be a great champion. But her complete lack of sportsmanship will forever be a thorn in the side of her legacy; and rightfully so for someone so totally devoid of humility, and so filled with [seeming] disdain for her fellow players and anyone or anything that doesn't further her self-aggrandizing greatness."

Financial Impacts of the Oil Bust of 2015

From an article in the New York Times comes an article about the oil bust economy and financial impacts they have had on the area of the Karnes County, TX. The article , I think, unintentionally highlights the financial irresponsibility of area households, businesses and oil field workers by their spending freely during the boom times, but failing to save during the bust that would inevitably follow. The following was my response to the article...

"Just how many propaganda pieces are we going to see? So those in Karnes County, TX are feeling the pinch of the oil bust...so what? During the boom times, just how many in that area threw as much savings into their banks, versus how many would simply spend all of those huge paychecks?

Financial irresponsibility by those in and around that area is simply staggering. Sure, it's nice to pay off debt, buy a few nice things for the family, go on an extra trip or two during the year...but at what cost? Boom employees should know very well the risks of spending everything when the boom could stop at any time--the same goes for local businesses. It would seem that during boom times, it is only logical to save for the inevitable downturn that will shake the area. Why they didn't prepare themselves financially is a mystery. Now, the American taxpayer must make up the difference with THEIR moneys paying for shelter, food, medical bills, etc through governmental assistance programs.

This story has played out time and again around America. The American dream of financial independence has driven people to take extraordinary chances over the last two hundred and thirty years. Sometimes those chances pay off, while others only see financial ruin. The westward expansion is a terrific example of this, as is the post-Civil War land grab by people just wanting a better life. Then this played out again during the Alaskan Gold Rush, the Dust Bowl and Depression era years. It will be interesting to see the migration patterns that academics will surely study when they research the boom and bust years of the oil industry and the financial impacts that surely follow. I have to wonder how the financially irresponsible in areas such as Karnes County, Tx will be labled by these professors and researchers. Foolish; Dreamers; Spenders, etc. 

For now, readers will have to endure more propaganda from areas and people who should have known better than to spend everything they had. Maybe, we will ALL learn a lesson from the oil bust of 2015."

Religious Liberty: A Fundamental Human Right

The following video, a speech by Senator Orrin Hatch on the Senate Floor, hits the nail directly on the head regarding the right of Americans to practice their religion in the face of social change. Please, watch the video in its entirety.

https://youtu.be/Icguz3yMGBQ

Hateful Rhetoric Following the US Supreme Court Ruling on Gay Marriage

A few hours ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a deeply divided 5-4 majority, that gay marriage is legal in all states. This decision has unleashed a torrent of hateful rhetoric...by those on the winning side!
This whole post illustrates the hate that those who scream for equality, actually harbor towards those who stand up against gay marriage and homosexuality.
The following are comments from various response boards and are not written, nor altered in any way, by me.
*I must warn you, that some of these comments are graphic.

*by Tony S
"What you have hidden in your past does not make it right in our eyes Jim. You say your newly found god forgives you, we don't as a society."


*by Steve L
"To all you right wing knuckle draggers. You people who hate anything not like you. You are in fact having a very bad week. Why are you always on the wrong side of history? The rest of America is laughing at you! You big redneck dope!"


*by Jared M
"F@@@K your god. I smite all you pieces of crap and your god damn but F@@@King religion. Your god is a croc of sh@T."


*by John D
"KG "Hell" is another misconception. If there is such an eternal lake of fire it most likely awaits your arrival anxiously, ready to devour your soul for being such a homophobic hater."


*by Nelson C
"Your God of injustice, abuse and exploitation or MY God of justice, understanding, and tolerance. Of the two, I prefer my God and Mike Fuckadoodle and his brethren including you can go to Hell."


*by Tryan B
"Jim Cochran, God told me that He wants you to start sucking off guys pronto! So hop to it, man!"


*by David R
"GOD PERSONALLY told me that he's okay with gay marriage and that you were a mistake :)"


*by Dale B
"Your God can go f*** himself. he is a piece of s*** tyrant that needs to be shot in the forehead."


*by Wallace M
"...your just another Christian spewing hate when things don't go your way. you are suppose to give up those imaginary friends about the age of 5."


*by Jeff J
"Tom F Don't make fun of Christians just because they are hypocrites, they can't help themselves. 95% of them don't have a clue what the bible really says."


*by Eddie S
"...since you know so much about it you must yourself be gay or? No. Then STFU!"


*by Kent B
" ...do you really believe this? You are truly nuts. Maybe crazy people like you should be "incarcerated or executed".


*by Edward P
"... then get the hell out of our awesome country...go be a pathetic CUNT someplace else."


*by Kristina O
"You are entitled to your opinion. Most of us, however, do not place much importance on opinions based on hatred and bigotry. Amazing how people like you will proudly state such nonsense."


*by Mario Q
"OK Christians...the country has sinned...please, it is time for you to go to your God and show your contempt for a world ruled by Satan...any cliff will do and all you have to do is step off it...or surely there is a bottle of drano under the sink and you can chug it...c'mon, pray to Yeezus to give you the strength and resolve to do it...or you can chug some Jim Beam to give you the valor to step off a cliff, what the heck...you cannot stay on this earth...or on this country, but you really cannot find another country on a world map and they are all probably communists...you must commit suicide and leave the realm of Satan!"

These comments are only a very small sampling of the intolerant hatred being spewed by the winning side. What's more, the comments, as a whole, clearly show that the next battleground in this fight will be against religion itself. But that, is for another commentary.

Let the People Decide--Not the Courts

From Senator Mike Lee on the issue of gay marriage and the Constitution:

"Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case involving four separate lawsuits, each dealing with the same question: does the U.S. Constitution require the redefinition of marriage?

The answer is simple: there is nothing in the Constitution prohibiting the states from retaining the traditional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
This case comes from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled last year that the citizens of Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee have the constitutional authority to amend their state constitutions to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
The basis of the 6th Circuit’s decision is the plain fact that the Constitution is silent on the question of marriage, just as it is silent on many questions that arise in the public square.

This is by design.

When the Constitution neither requires nor forbids a particular policy outcome, it leaves the matter up to the people to decide. In this sense, our Constitution is not an answer book as much as it is a blueprint. It’s purpose is not to resolve every debate, but to create a framework of government in which a free people can govern themselves and address the questions of the day through their elected representatives.

And unless it’s an issue of specifically national or interstate consequence, the Constitution directs this decision-making process to occur at the state level, to create the space for the greatest diversity of opinions to be expressed.

This is how marriage policy has always been determined in America. As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy rightly observed in United States v. Windsor, “[t]he significance of state responsibilities for the definition and regulation of marriage dates to the Nation’s beginning.”

The current debate about same-sex marriage does not change the fact that marriage policy should be decided by the people and their representatives, not dictated by unelected judges.

In recent years, voters in more than 30 states, including Utah, have passed amendments to their state constitutions that define marriage as an exclusively male-female institution. In 11 other states, the people have chosen to redefine marriage to include same-sex relationships.

The democratic process has yielded a diversity of outcomes because there is no consensus regarding the definition of marriage. The country is obviously in the process of making up its mind. The Supreme Court should not short-circuit that democratic process by substituting the views of five judges for those of 320 million people.
But while Americans may be divided over the definition of marriage, an overwhelming majority of people agree that the government should not coerce anyone into violating their beliefs about marriage.

A recent poll shows 81 percent of Americans agree “that government should leave people free to follow their beliefs about marriage as they live their daily lives at work and in the way they run their businesses.” Yet today there are many individuals, associations and businesses in America who are denied this fundamental right of conscience.
There are those involved in the wedding industry — like photographers, florists, bakers and even ordained ministers — who face coercion, intimidation, costly lawsuits and financial penalties from state or local officials for declining to participate in same-sex ceremonies. And there are the religiously affiliated adoption agencies that are forced to shut down because their faith directs them to place children with a mother and a father.
This should be concerning to all Americans, regardless of one’s view on marriage. When a government forces someone to choose between making a living serving one’s community and adhering to one’s religious beliefs, our society is left less tolerant and we are all made less free.

Many of these threats must be addressed at the state and local level. But there is also a role for Congress to at least ensure federal powers aren’t employed against those exercising their religious beliefs.

In the wake of the Windsor decision, President Obama declared that, because “Americans hold a wide range of views” on the issue of marriage, “maintaining our nation’s commitment to religious freedom” is “vital.”

I agree.

That’s why, as the marriage debate progresses, I am committed to passing legislation clarifying that federal laws cannot be used to penalize individuals or groups who believe in traditional marriage."

Problems In the US Senate (2015) Begin With The Democratic Party

I received the following newsletter from Senator Mike Lee (UT) in our nation's Capital...


Time to Stop Delaying Democracy

"The Senate has been a much busier place these last few weeks than it was under the previous leadership.  With Republicans in charge of the Senate we have held more votes on amendments in the first few weeks of the 114^th Congress than were allowed in the Democrat-led Senate during all of 2014.  And we have already seen the positive effects of restoring the American people’s voice in the Senate.  During the debate to authorize the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, I introduced two amendments that were voted on by the Senate.  The first amendment would limit frivolous lawsuits filed under the Endangered Species Act, and the second would speed up the process for the BLM to approve leasing permits.

The Senate and the House eventually passed the Keystone XL pipeline bill, and it is now sitting on the president's desk, waiting for him to sign it into law or veto it.

For the next major legislative item, Republicans are trying to keep our promise to the American people and do what we were sent here to do: keep the government funded, especially the agencies protecting our homeland security, and hold the President accountable for his abuses of power.  But standing in the way are Senate Democrats who refuse to even allow consideration of the DHS funding bill, so they won’t have to declare where they stand on the President’s illegal and unconstitutional action on executive amnesty.  This effort to try and hide from the American people is embarrassing.
 
Republican leaders in the Senate have repeatedly signaled that they will give Democrats every opportunity to amend provisions of the bill that they don’t like.  But even this is rejected, because it would require Democrats to go on record as supporting or opposing the president’s executive amnesty.

Democrats say they have an alternative bill and insist that we pass it immediately. There are two problems with that approach.

First, while that may have been how the Senate worked under the previous majority – writing bills in back rooms, waiting until the last minute to make them public, blocking amendments and debate, and ramming the bill through without any input from the American people – that’s not the way the Senate is supposed to work, and it’s not the way the Senate is working with Republicans in control.

And second, appropriations bills aren’t supposed to start in the Senate.  In fact, the House has not considered a Senate-originated appropriations bill since at least 1901 -  the period for which records are readily available.

And unfortunately for them, the bill the Democrats want is not supported in the House because it’s not supported by the American people.

It is time to stop delaying democracy; it’s time to stop hiding from the American people and start debating the future of homeland security funding."
After reading this, I want you to ask yourself, "How is my Senator voting in Congress, and does he/she represent the people, or are Party interests taking precedent over everything else?"
In this day and age, when corporate interests are seemingly placed above the welfare of the citizens of the great country, it is more vital than ever that you are aware of the politics in Washington D.C, and how you are affected by the decisions being made of your behalf. Are your Congressional Reps more interested in PAC's, Corporate Welfare and other Special Interests over and above that of their voting constituents? Or do they truly represent the Will of the People? Do you even know how to answer that?

If you don't know the answers to those questions, then please contact your House of Representatives duly elected Rep, and your US Senators. Sign up for their newsletters, write them on important issues--or even issues which are important to you!--get yourself involved in the process! If you do nothing, then don't like what's happening, then you really can't complain at all! So Write, Call, Read up on news and events, and know where your elected Congressional Reps stand on issues.
Things in DC will never change if ordinary people do nothing. Get involved!!!